Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Heno Fagerian v. Pacific Auto Body and Paint Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02416
Plaintiff:
Heno Fagerian
Defendant:
Pacific Auto Body and Paint Inc., Markar Hamlet Khanyan as an individual and owner doing business as Pacific Auto Body and Paint, Inc., Jessie Stauffacher President and CEO of American Family Connect Property and Causalty Insurance Company doing business as Ameriprise Auto and Home Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 8:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Milbank Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 8:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Milbank Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, -, Kia America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FAMILY CONNECT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot USA, Inc. and DOES 1 to 15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00221
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Electrolux North America, Inc. and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FAMILY CONNECT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
