Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIVINGSTON v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
MERLYN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SKAT v. THE SKYBAX LLC 401K PLAN et al
as 3:2018cv10592
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
THE SKYBAX LLC 401K PLAN and BRADLEY CRESCENZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIFESCAN, INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv05552
Cross Defendant:
SAHILY PAOLINE, STEVEN L. HADLOCK, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P. and others
Cross Claimant:
JEFFREY C. SMITH
Plaintiff:
LIFESCAN, INC.
Interested Party:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC., Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
Defendant:
GEOFFREY S. SWINDLE, MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, ADAM KOOPERSMITH and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ZB, N.A.
Special Master:
THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
3Rd Party Defendant:
XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Manger 1-99, PRIME THERAPEUTICS LLC, XYZ Corporation Distributors 1-99 and others
Petitioner:
KPMG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GRECZYLO et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07234
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRECZYLO , CHARLES HALL , RED BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and VOLKSWAGEN AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONNELLY et al v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07019
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE DONNELLY and KEVIN J. DONNELLY
Defendant:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, W.J. BRADLEY MORTGAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOE NOS. 1-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kreisler v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2008cv04205
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Kreisler
Defendant:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, L.L.C. and TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
