Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Village of Farmingdale v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 2:2023cv02254
Plaintiff:
Village of Farmingdale
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Ferro Corporation and Vulcan Materials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Village of Farmingdale v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2023cv02254
Plaintiff:
Village of Farmingdale
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Ferro Corporation and Vulcan Materials Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hicksville Water District v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 2:2019cv05632
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company, Ferro Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Hicksville Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hicksville Water District v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2019cv05632
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company, Ferro Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Hicksville Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe County Water Authority v. The Euclid Chemical Company et al
as 6:2009cv06111
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Water Authority and Monroe County Water Authority
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company, The Euclid Chemical Company and Tamms Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Albertson Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02406
Plaintiff:
Albertson Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Town of Huntington/Dix Hills Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02405
Plaintiff:
Town of Huntington/Dix Hills Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
City of Greenlawn Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02407
Plaintiff:
City of Greenlawn Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
City of Glen Clove Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02403
Plaintiff:
City of Glen Clove Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
