Cases 91 - 100 of 104
NOT USED
as 2:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Delbert M. Greene
Defendant:
Dwight Neven, Isidro Baca, Claud Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Green v. Nereu et al
as 2:2007cv01108
Petitioner:
Lawrence Green
Respondent:
Dewight Nereu and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Donat et al
as 3:2007cv00362
Petitioner:
Frederic Green
Respondent:
Bill Donat and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2007cv00855
Plaintiff:
Mario Green
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mizzoni v. Brown et al
as 3:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Mizzoni
Defendant:
Brown, Green, Glen Whorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Williams et al
as 2:2007cv00605
Petitioner:
Edmond Wade Green
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams, Sr. and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
