Cases 91 - 100 of 13,981
Laymon v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Raymond Oscar Laymon
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Nevada Attorney General and Warden L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corrales v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Valentin A. Corrales
Respondent:
Henley and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tsatsa v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tsatsa
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Halkie, Vallegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Orvil Grimes
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Bensen, Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battles v. Pollard
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Battles
Defendant:
Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. CCDC et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brown
Defendant:
CCDC and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. District Attorney Joshua Judd
as 2:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
District Attorney Joshua Judd and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Repp et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ambibe Collins
Defendant:
J. Repp and Jaymie Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Cardella et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Rosas
Defendant:
Cardella, Henley, Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
