Cases 111 - 120 of 412
Darryl Wakefield v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL KENT WAKEFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and RICHARD INDERMILL
Michael Slater v. William Sullivan, et al
as 09-17784
Petitioner - Appellee:
MICHAEL CRAIG SLATER
Respondent - Appellant:
WILLIAM SULLIVAN, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Terrence Landry v. James Tilton
as 09-17585
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRENCE JAMES LANDRY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Bruno Campostrini v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17567
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUNO CAMPOSTRINI
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden
Martin Killingsworth v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 09-17568
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN A. KILLINGSWORTH
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and JAMES E. TILTON
Marland Purvis v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 09-56813
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLAND PURVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT M. KERNAN, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Daniel Arenas v. T. Felker, et al
as 09-56787
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL S. ARENAS
Respondent - Appellee:
T. FELKER, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Director
John Balbo v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL BALBO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, JOHN DOVEY and ROBERT SILLEN
Richard Crane v. S. Hatton, et al
as 09-17391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HATTON, CO in individual and official capacities, G. SCHOPF, CO, Salinas Valley State Prison, Facility A, COOK J. MAGALLON and others
Joe Keel, II v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17374
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE HOWARD KEEL, II
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
