Cases 121 - 130 of 1,414
MARVIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02097
Petitioner:
MARK MARVIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARVIN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA
as 1:2021cv01872
Petitioner:
MARK MARVIN and RICHARD BARNETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MACMAHON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SKYDANCE MACMAHON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
THIEME v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv01750
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THIEME
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SHOVE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2021cv01563
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff:
THEODORE SHOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONTEFRACT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01591
Plaintiff:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01546
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN STITT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01672
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EL-AMIN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
