Cases 131 - 140 of 157
Solis v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
Luis Solis, Jr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Mark Gemlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Baerlocker et al
as 1:2009cv00610
Plaintiff:
James D Wheeler
Defendant:
Nancy Baerlocker, Brent Reinke, Phillip Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cacciaguidi v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00563
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Ann Cacciaguidi
Defendant:
Brent Reinke and Olivia Craven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nick Mennick v. Brent Reinke
as 09-35916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK BRADLEY MENNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE
Lerajjarean Ra-o-kel-ly v. Michael Johnson
as 09-35712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, THOMAS BEAUCLAIR, BRENT REINKE and others
Cacciaguidi v. Reinke et al
as 4:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Ann Cacciaguidi
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Olivia Craven, Bruce Wells-Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
John E. Thurston
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Larry Hynes, Johanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hebert v. Reinke
as 1:2009cv00324
Petitioner:
James E Hebert
Respondent:
Brent Reinke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brady v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Brady
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Zarah Martin, Randy Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spickler v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Spickler
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Johanna Smith, J. Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
