Cases 131 - 140 of 3,859
Parker v. Doyle et al
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Parker
Defendant:
Mary Dayle, Officer Malloy, Officer Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00733
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meades v. May
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Meades
Defendant:
Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert James Piper
Defendant:
Warden Scott Ceresini, Peggy Chrowie, Sherri Gorlwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Byron White
Respondent:
State of Delaware, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Warden Scott Ceresini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medley v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
Wilbur L. Medley, III
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
