Cases 161 - 170 of 650
MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RENEE MARSHALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. MALDENADO et al
as 1:2018cv01163
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON
Defendant:
RAUL MALDENADO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01132
Plaintiff:
FRED SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAD v. LAMBERTH et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Defendant:
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARRY WEIGAN, III and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01102
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00941
Petitioner:
DUANE MCKINNEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOBKA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00873
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. BOBKA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD ROSENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUVALL et al v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2018cv00736
Plaintiff:
KERRITH DUVALL, ROBERT COTNER, DENNIS MARTIN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOY AL-MAHDI v. PAUL et al
as 1:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
HAKIYM JOAQUIN FOY AL-MAHDI
Defendant:
DAVID PAUL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00709
Petitioner:
EDBIN RAMIREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
