Cases 171 - 180 of 3,853
Reed v. Benoir
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jerome B. Reed
Defendant:
Rob Benoir and Bob Benoir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathersby v. Centurion Management Care LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Gerone L. Weathersby
Defendant:
Centurion Management Care LLC and Dr. Misty May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Hakiem Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Eric-Bernard Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Scott Ceresini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloman v. Hudson et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Holloman
Defendant:
Commissioner Monroe Hudson, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Warden Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlow v. Platkin
as 1:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Respondent:
Matthew Platkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrer-Vasquez v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Carlos Ferrer-Vasquez
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cephas v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Vernon E. Cephas
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Joseph Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. DeJesus et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
