Cases 11 - 20 of 14,259
Otero v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv01725
Petitioner:
Teresa S. Otero
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada, State of Nevada and Reubart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardison v. Carmicheal et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Casey William Hardison
Respondent:
Pershing County Jail Nevada and Nathan Carmicheal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Osterhout v. Medical Staff at FMWCC et al
as 2:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Brandy Osterhout
Defendant:
Medical Staff at FMWCC and Warden at FMWCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Defendant:
Sheckles, Williams, Bequeet and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jim v. Narvaiza et al
as 3:2024cv00416
Defendant:
Director of Recon Medical, Jail Psychiatrist and Aitor Narvaiza
Plaintiff:
Jay L. Jim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Klomp
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jorge Hernandez
Defendant:
Klomp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thrower v. Parker et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Defendant:
Duoglivo, Parker, Whittmore and others
Plaintiff:
Shantez O.D. Thrower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Faulkner et al
as 2:2024cv01702
Petitioner:
Nathan L. Lomax
Respondent:
Bob Faulkner and William Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. HDSP Dental Department
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Toney A. White
Defendant:
HDSP Dental Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Swides et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Defendant:
Swides, NDOC Investigator General and M. Hubbard-Pickett
Plaintiff:
De'zuan Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
