Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Morris v. Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney Office
as 1:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
Cameron Morris
Defendant:
Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Canyon County
as 1:2019cv00434
Respondent:
Canyon County
Petitioner:
Cameron Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sivo v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl-Linn Sivo
Respondent:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sivo v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Steve Sivo
Defendant:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamson v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Cody Adamson
Defendant:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sochinsky v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sochinsky
Defendant:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demoura v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael Demoura
Defendant:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Craven et al
as 1:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Michael C McCoy
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, Mary Morris, Todd Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Bevan
as 1:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Donald Morris
Defendant:
G. Richard Bevan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gisel v. Agler et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Dan Morris Gisel
Defendant:
David Agler, Acel K Thacker and Idaho Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
