Cases 11 - 20 of 6,918
CONNER v. LANDRY
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
ALBERTUS CONNER, JR.
Defendant:
JEFF LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSEBAR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR, ERIC M. ROSEBAR and ERIN M. ROSEBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALVIN GROSS, FORTY ACRES REALTY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01135
Petitioner:
KEVIN JAMES LYONS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
EDWARD JACOB LANG
Not Yet Classified:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and HERIBERTO TELLEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
TENNEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
GEORGE AMOS TENNEY, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YARULLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
ILMIYA YARULLINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DIRECTOR JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
OGBENNA v. USA
as 1:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY OGBENNA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
WAYNE C. MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VASS v. BRAWNER
as 1:2024cv00723
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. VASS
Respondent:
RONALD BRAWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
