Cases 11 - 20 of 14,048
Dezfooli v. Chestnut
as 2:2024cv01108
Petitioner:
Meelad Dezfooli
Respondent:
Christopher Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. State of Nevada
as 2:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Gabrial Williams
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Jesse Calvin Gilbert
Respondent:
Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, The City of Ely, The County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Noel Nunn and Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, The City of Ely, The County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Ely State Prison
as 2:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Barrett, Joseph Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevius v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nevius
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guerrero v. Auram et al
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Aaron Guerrero
Defendant:
Auram and Director of Nursing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kern v. Drummond et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stephen R.F. Kern, Jr.
Defendant:
David Drummond and Tasheena Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
