Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Cross v. Jaeger et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson and Ron Jaeger
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01377
Defendant:
Arera, Cheryl Burson, B. Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Southern Desert Correctional Center et al
as 2:2013cv01166
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Frank Dreesen, Mrs. Garnett and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01029
Defendant:
S. Brooks, Cheryl Burson, T. Carlman and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell Fields v. Cheryl Burson, et al
as 13-15963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL BURSON, BRIAN WILLIAMS and CAMERON SEISAN, Correctional Officer - erroneously sued as C/O Seisan
Woods v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Dr. Arera, R. Bannister, S. Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv00698
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Greg Cox, Jason Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Gallo v. Cheryl Burson, et al
as 13-15543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD E. GALLO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL BURSON, Associate Warden of Programs, FNU RUSSELL, Correctional Case Specialist II, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Mack v. Sandavol et al
as 2:2012cv02171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Frank Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Duran Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv02120
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Guy R. Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
