Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
MILLER v. NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv01107
Respondent: NORTHERN DIST. OF ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. and others
Petitioner: SHARIFF MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OKEAYAINNEH v. U S DEPT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant: DIRECTOR/CHIEF OF HUMAN RESOURCES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE and U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff: JULIAN OKEAYAINNEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01289
Plaintiff: RONNIE L. BRYANT
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALVAN v. U.S. STATE DEPT. et al
as 1:2015cv00305
Plaintiff: JAIME GALVAN
Defendant: U.S. STATE DEPT., EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, U.S. PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FALLAS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2011cv02048
Plaintiff: RONALD ALBERTO FALLAS
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE U.S. STATE DEPT., EXECUTIVE OFFICE F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DUCKETT v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01521
Petitioner: PHILLIP ERIC DUCKETT
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES , U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR and D.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JENNINGS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00831
Plaintiff: TROY JENNINGS
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BROOKLYN U.S. PROBATION DEPT., U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?