Cases 11 - 20 of 90
STRAIN v. MA'AT
as 4:2023cv00026
Respondent:
S' MA'AT and FILIPE MARTINEZ, JR
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE STRAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Cunningham
as 5:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Duane Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. OQUENDO et al
as 5:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
J ROMANO, ELKIN, OQUENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Florida
as 1:2022cv21532
Plaintiff:
Garland Duane Davis
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baalim v. USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Defendant:
USA, Inc., State of Florida, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Cunningham et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Edwin W Lockhart
Defendant:
Duane Cunningham, Carrie Daffron, Jason Brenes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Defendant:
USA, Inc., State of Florida, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Florida
as 1:2022cv21029
Plaintiff:
Garland Duane Davis
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2021cv23771
Plaintiff:
Garland Duane Davis
Defendant:
State of Florida, US Marshals Office and Pinellas County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00469
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Nicholas Duane Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
