Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Char v. The Queen's Medical Center - West Oahu et al
as 1:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, M.D. Brandi Gary and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliciano v. Kaplan
as 1:2018cv00299
Respondent:
Gary Kaplan, Megan Owens, Janice Lepule and others
Petitioner:
Gary Feliciano
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slavick v. Colotario et al
as 1:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
Chris Slavick
Defendant:
Michael Souza, An Uedoi, Richard Lopez and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Scott Gordon
Defendant:
Francis Sequeira, John Does 1-5, John Does 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
Champagne Hamilton, Lei Lealaimatafao, Lavilavi Ti'a and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aquino v. Hawaii, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Brian Aquino
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of, H.C.F., Scott Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. HCF Inmate Grievance Specialist et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Inmate Grievance Specialist, Nolan Espinda, HCF Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Espinda
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Verece Abraham
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kealoha v. Espinda et al
as 1:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Kealoha
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Francis Sequeira , Lyle Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shinn
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Opherro Gary Jones
Defendant:
Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
