Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Chijioke v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Petitioner:
Remigius N. Chijioke
Respondent:
Mr. Garland, Mr. Alejandro Mayorkas, Mr. Thomas Feely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nduwimana v. Feeley et al
as 1:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosen, Jeffrey Searls, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Apollinaire Nduwimana
Respondent:
David Pekoske, Jeffrey Searles, Robert M. Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bazile v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv01819
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas Feely, Mr. William Barr, Mr. Jeffrey Searls and others
Petitioner:
Stanley Bazile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lorenzo v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv07019
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Garcia Aguilar Lorenzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv01183
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, James McHenry, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
O'Neil Damion Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00993
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 6:2020cv06561
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velez Funes v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00883
Petitioner:
Angel H. Velez Funes
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas Feely, Mr. William Barr, Mr. Jeffrey Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aung v. Barr, et al
as 1:2020cv00681
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner:
YAE HTAT AUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
