Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Holzemer v. Murphy
as 2:2010cv00204
Petitioner:
Matthew Holzemer
Respondent:
Michael J Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
John Parker Murphy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dean v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Randy L Dean
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, Wyoming State Penitentiary, Robert Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Randy L Dean
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, Wyoming State Penitentiary, Robert Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Prison Health Services Inc Medical Director et al
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P Walker
Defendant:
Prison Health Services Inc Medical Director, John F Coyle, Prison Health Services PA-C and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster v. Patrice et al
as 2:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zachary R Foster
Defendant:
V Patrice, David Ebell and Michael J Murphy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodrick v. Lampert et al
as 2:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Michael Murphy, Prison Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ervin vs. Snell, et al.
as 2:2009cv00044
Defendant:
Steven R Ervin, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Correctional Officer, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Snell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodrick v Lampert et al
as 2:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Michael Murphy, Ruby Dickie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphin v. Murphy
as 1:2009cv00021
Petitioner:
Joshua T Alphin
Defendant:
Michael J Murphy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
