Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Davis v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Davis
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ryan Franklin and Franklin Ryan
Defendant:
Washoe County and NaphCare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coenen v. Naphcare et al
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Brendan R Coenen
Defendant:
Naphcare and Washoe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriquez v. Duran et al
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez Rodriquez
Defendant:
Dr. Duran, NaphCare Inc., Armida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Washoe County Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marcel Chatman
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Center, Washoe County, WCDF Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glynn Branch
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilbra v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zafferine Amit McGilbra
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rae Hancock
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Naphcare et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Allen
Defendant:
Naphcare, Sheriff Balaam, James P. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooker v. NaphCare Medical et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Chris L. Hooker
Defendant:
NaphCare Medical, CCDC, Janny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
