Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Osadolor Osadolor v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv06131
Respondent:
DHS, Chad Wolf, Steven Ahrendt and others
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Osadolor Osadolor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
A.S.D. v. Decker et al
as 7:2020cv03118
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Carl E. DuBois and Chad Wolf
Petitioner:
A.S.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv03221
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Olukayode David Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00424
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner:
Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Seemangal v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv03057
Respondent:
Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, Field Office Dir. Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Petitioner:
MAIGHBARRAN SEEMANGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Beswick et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02765
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Dirkis Castrillo-Castrillo, Olvin Geovany Rodriguez, Yoscal Mogena-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pena v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv02482
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and Director Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Pena Raynell Leonardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Bonilla v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv02483
Petitioner:
Durel Jordon Bonilla
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker and Acting Secretary Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Quito v. Decker
as 1:2019cv10662
Respondent:
Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Sergio Quito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Bob v. DHS et al
as 1:2019cv10422
Respondent:
ICE, DHS and Ins. Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Nata S. Bob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
