Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Hinkson v. The United State of America, et al.
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
David R Hinkson
Defendant:
The United State of America, Richard Tallman, Edward J Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Horn v. Bannock County Jail, et al.
as 4:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Trevor Alan Van Horn
Defendant:
Bannock County Jail, Detective Russell Gunter, Jake Christiansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. United States, et al.
as 1:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
United States, Century Link, Inc., ICS Telecom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Paul
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aloba v. United States, et al.
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi S Aloba, Oriyomi Aloba and Oriyomi Saddiq Aloba
Defendant:
United States, Sim Lake, Lyn Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byerly v. United States Joint Task Force, et al.
as 1:2021cv00049
Respondent:
John Doe Smyth, John Doe Sheldaul, John Doe Gibney and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Ada County, Sue Wessels, United State Joint Task Force and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00513
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cherie R Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reynolds v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00490
Petitioner:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Byerly v. United States et al
as 1:2020cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
United States, State of Idaho, Ada County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
