Cases 11 - 20 of 6,910
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OGBENNA v. USA
as 1:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY OGBENNA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SNOWDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL SNOWDEN
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DAVIS # 892 and others
DRAPER v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
LORETTA HILLWARE
Defendant:
JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL COLE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. DC ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIMITRI JOHNSON
Defendant:
DC ATTORNEY GENERAL and DC MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAIR et al v. HEALY et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE MCNAIR and JAMES MCNAIR
Defendant:
THOMAS HEALY, SUASAN BORECKI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEERIKKATTIL v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
RANJITH KEERIKKATTIL
Respondent:
COLLETE S. PETERS and WARDEN VICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
