Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,914
TENNEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner: GEORGE AMOS TENNEY, III
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YARULLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff: ILMIYA YARULLINA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DIRECTOR JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
OGBENNA v. USA
as 1:2024cv00901
Petitioner: ROSEMARY OGBENNA
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner: JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent: DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00772
Petitioner: WAYNE C. MORGAN
Respondent: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VASS v. BRAWNER
as 1:2024cv00723
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER A. VASS
Respondent: RONALD BRAWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00717
Petitioner: EMMANUEL COLE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STOTTLEMYER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00552
Petitioner: TARA AILEEN STOTTLEMYER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. DC ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff: KEITH DIMITRI JOHNSON
Defendant: DC ATTORNEY GENERAL and DC MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAIR et al v. HEALY et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff: JIMMIE MCNAIR and JAMES MCNAIR
Defendant: THOMAS HEALY, SUASAN BORECKI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?