Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Utah
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Guardado v. Merrill et al
as 2:2014cv00579
Plaintiff: Brian Luis Guardado
Defendant: Raymond Merrill, Chris Abott, Sidney G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthen v. Harms
as 2:2014cv00449
Petitioner: Scott G. Worthen
Respondent: Clark A. Harms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hogan v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2014cv00352
Plaintiff: Teddy R. Hogan
Defendant: Alfred Bigelow and Clark Holladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2014cv00333
Plaintiff: Raymond Payne
Defendant: Alfred Bigelow, Utah Board of Pardons, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Clark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00226
Plaintiff: Earl L. Barnes
Defendant: Logan S. Clark, Joseph Coombs, Kennon Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00114
Petitioner: Tony Alexander Hamilton
Respondent: USA, State of Utah, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garman v. Sanchez-Rose et al
as 2:2013cv00875
Plaintiff: John Paul Garman
Defendant: Coral Sanchez-Rose and Jeffrey N. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dimmick v. Harms et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00794
Plaintiff: Dustin Dimmick
Defendant: Clark A. Harms and Angela Micklos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moll v. Garden et al
as 2:2013cv00719
Plaintiff: Michael Moll
Defendant: Richard Garden, FNU Umbrell, Logan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Bigelow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00334
Petitioner: Jeffrey Keith Spencer
Respondent: R. Bigelow, Utah State Board of Pardons and Parole, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?