Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2016cv00606
Petitioner:
Michael Adam Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maddux v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
Douglas Adam Maddux
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections , Scott Crowther , Richard Garden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. City of Salt Lake City et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Yesha Anthony Garcia
Defendant:
City of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, Salt Lake Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsen v. Windor
as 2:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Adam Delbert Olsen
Defendant:
James Windor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. United States Central Government, The et al
as 2:2011cv00632
Petitioner:
Dale Livingston
Respondent:
United States Central Government, The, State of Utah, The, State Actors being and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bankhead v. Jeneatti et al
as 2:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fabian Lyle Bankhead
Defendant:
Jacob Jeneatti, FNU DeLora, Annie Tippetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Gardner et al
as 2:2010cv00746
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
Richard Gardner, Kennon Tubbs and Chris Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodsell v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
Travis Wayne Goodsell
Defendant:
State of Utah, Lohra L. Miller, Howard Lemcke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00879
Petitioner:
Nealy W. Adams, Nealy W. Adams and Nealy W. Adams
Respondent:
State of Utah, Utah Department of Corrections, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00774
Petitioner:
Irven Douglas Adams
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
