Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Villarreal v. Donahue et al
as 1:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Victor Villarreal
Defendant:
Donahue, Miller, Andrew Kuni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Yordy
as 1:2015cv00157
Petitioner:
Richard Andrew Hubbard
Respondent:
Howard Yordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kellis v. Carlin
as 3:2015cv00094
Petitioner:
Timothy Andrew Kellis
Respondent:
Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browning v. Wasden et al
as 1:2014cv00493
Plaintiff:
Lawny Browning
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden, Brent Reinke, Tim Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Wood et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Burton Wright
Defendant:
Wood, John Does, Bradner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds et al v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Allan P Reynolds and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, R Hans Kruger and David S Begley
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden, Idaho State Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
