Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Bilal v. Akhtar et al
as 1:2013cv02842
Plaintiff:
Shateek Amin Bilal
Defendant:
Mohammad Akhtar, Shelly Williams, J. Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Fischer et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jason Riley
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Thomas Griffin, James Esgrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funderburke v. Canfield et al
as 6:2013cv06128
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Funderburke
Defendant:
Wesley Canfield, Thomas Griffin, Benjamin Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Griffin et al
as 1:2012cv00745
Plaintiff:
Leonard Randolph
Defendant:
Thomas R. Griffin, Thamas E. Hannah, Michael V. Robyck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillard v. Canfield et al
as 1:2012cv00428
Plaintiff:
Gary Gillard
Defendant:
Wesley K. Canfield, Benjamin A. Oakes, John VonHagn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Bradt
as 1:2012cv00793
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Bradt
Petitioner:
Clement Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Edward Jones
Defendant:
M. Tompkins, D. Uhler, Albert Prack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parra v. Wright et al
as 6:2011cv06270
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parra
Defendant:
Lester Wright, Ben Oakes, Dr. Canefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. C.O. Amoroso shield #2950 et al
as 2:2011cv01466
Defendant:
C.O. Amoroso shield #2950 and C.O. Benson shield #421
Plaintiff:
Josiah A. Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Griffin et al
as 6:2011cv06101
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Patrick Griffin, Angela Bartlett, Brian Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
