Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Loher v. Thomas
as 1:2009cv00499
Petitioner:
Frank O. Loher
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cutsinger v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00448
Petitioner:
Walter Lee Cutsinger
Respondent:
Clayton A. Frank, Todd Thomas and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paese v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00383
Plaintiff:
Nikolao Paese
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Nolan Espinda, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirksey v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00334
Plaintiff:
Anthony Durrell Kirksey
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Oahu Community Correctional Center Warden and Claudio Borge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamana'o v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00313
Petitioner:
Andrew Kamana'o
Respondent:
Clayton A. Frank, Nolan Espinda and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dias v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Dias
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Public Safety, Hawaii Department of, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salis v. Swenson et al
as 1:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
Zeph K. Salis
Defendant:
D. Swenson, John Ioane, Shari Kimoto and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Itagaki v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Wade T. Itagaki, Wade T. Itagaki, Wade T. Itagaki and others
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Clayton Frank, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schoenlein v. Frank et al
as 1:2008cv00503
Plaintiff:
Grey W. Schoenlein
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Francis Sequiera, Bennett Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Frank et al
as 1:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Francis Sequiera, Bennett Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
