Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeforth v. Rennie et al
as 1:2014cv01107
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
Sheldon K. Rennie, Courtroom Reporter/Stenographer, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Russell
as 1:2014cv01034
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Jackson
Defendant:
Rory Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown El Bey v. Wesley et al
as 1:2014cv01035
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
Wesley, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Barzilai K. Axelrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez et al v. Superior Court of Delaware et al
as 1:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter and others
Defendant:
Superior Court of Delaware, Members of the Congress of Delaware, Justice of the Peace Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widdoes v. Malone et al
as 1:2012cv01255
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kenneth Widdoes
Defendant:
P. Malone , Sherkey , Unnamed K-9 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Trice v. Chapman et al
as 1:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
William R. Trice
Defendant:
Larry Ivan Chapman, Mary M Szczytrowski, Kieth B Shyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Rubin et al
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Rubin, Diane C. Welsh, Steven P. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Walsh et al
as 1:2011cv01169
Defendant:
Michael Shogow, Todd Matthew, Ryan Sims and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Diane C. Walsh, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
