Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Ahmed Ali v. Randy Grounds, et al
as 17-55457
Petitioner - Appellant:
AHMED ALI
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Jesus Gonzalez v. Kamala Harri
as 17-55357
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS LARA GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Grant Hurlbert v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-55280
Petitioner - Appellant:
GRANT DALE HURLBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, KATHLEEN ANNE MCKENNA and JEFFREY BEARD
Francisco Hernandez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55126
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO RENE HERNANDEZ, AKA Rene Lopez
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Robert LeMaile-Williams v. People of State of California, et al
as 17-55121
Petitioner - Appellee:
ROBERT L. LEMAILE-WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Robert Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 16-56885
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT G. PULLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Johnny Romero v. Daniel Burns, et al
as 16-56516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY GONZALES ROMERO, also known as Eduardo Arena Garcia
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL BURNS, Superintendent and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Luis Tapia v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 16-16805
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS TAPIA
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Robert Gonzales v. F. Foulk, et al
as 16-56437
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
F. FOULK, Warden and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Seavon Pierce v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 16-16722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, ANTHONY DA SILVA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
