Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Idaho
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Hayes v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00226
Plaintiff: Michael T Hayes
Defendant: Tyler Nicodemus, Matthew Lee Alexander and Terry Rasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffelt et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff: Thomas Coffelt, Wayne D Merkley and Matthew S Daniels
Defendant: Idaho Department of Correction, Director of Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutcheson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00442
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Matthew D Hutcheson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Matthews v. Price
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff: Ryan Kelly Matthews
Defendant: Stephen Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Stancil et al
as 1:2015cv00578
Petitioner: Danny E. Matthews
Respondent: M.A. Stancil and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Stancil et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00563
Petitioner: Danny E. Matthews
Respondent: M.A. Stancil and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson v. Dawson et al
as 1:2014cv00407
Plaintiff: Matthew Cody Davidson
Defendant: April Dawson, Eve Morales and Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00222
Plaintiff: James N Clark
Defendant: Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J R Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Sheriff of Ada Co Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff: Matthew Jay Bryan
Defendant: Sheriff of Ada Co Jail, Medical Staff of Ada Co Jail and Northwest Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff: Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant: C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?