Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Harrington v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
State of Utah and Erin Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jay Bryan
Defendant:
Labratory Corporation of America Holdings and Mountain Peaks Family Practice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lubeck et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Dexter Paris Davis
Defendant:
Bruce Lubeck, Matthew J. Hansen, Matthew A. Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. Utah State Hospital
as 2:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
Utah State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Norris
as 2:2013cv00622
Petitioner:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
Kevin Norris and Dallas Earnshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Zions First National Bank
as 2:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Reginald Williams
Defendant:
Zions First National Bank, Utah Department of Corrections, Zions Bancorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Roger Bauer, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Norris
as 2:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
Kevin Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. Glazier et al
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Harrington
Defendant:
Dane Glazier and Intermountain Valley View Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Bradley
as 2:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hardy
Defendant:
Matthew Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
