Cases 21 - 30 of 42
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. LEIBOVITZ et al
as 1:2012cv00571
Plaintiff:
DERRON SMITH
Defendant:
LYNN LEIBOVITZ, RUSSELL F. CANAN, GLENN KIRSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEWETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2011cv01852
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RUSSELL JEWETT, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RUSSELL v. USA
as 1:2011cv01925
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
REGINALD M. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2011cv00841
Petitioner:
JOHN L. WAY
Respondent:
ISAAC JOHNSON, RICHARDSON, SHARON MAYS-JACKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CASO v. USA
as 1:2011cv00792
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RUSSELL JAMES CASO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JUDD v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00984
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
