Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Kehano v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Respondent:
Francis X. Sequeira, Richard T. Bissen, Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gowadia vs. Sorenson; et al.
as 1:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Noshir Gowadia
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Sorenson, Florence T. Nakakuni, Christopher B. Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kehano v. Espinda et al
as 1:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Shackley F. Raffetto, Richard T. Bissen, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dominic T. Brooks
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety , Shari Kimoto, Saguaro Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00444
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Fuller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. USA
as 1:2011cv00106
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rex T. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kim v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Petitioner:
Rodney H.S. Kim
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Probation Office, T. J. Mahoney & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Travis v. McGrew
as 1:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Bruce Robert Travis
Respondent:
Linda T. McGrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Razo vs. Thomas, et al.
as 1:2009cv00452
Petitioner:
Vince William Razo
Respondent:
T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Razo v. Thomas
as 1:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Vince William Razo
Respondent:
T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
