Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez-Marquez v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv01718
Respondent:
Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Marquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01501
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Gentry
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2017cv01393
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Neven
Petitioner:
Ricardo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Patenaude and Felix CPA et al
as 2:2017cv00996
Respondent:
American Express, Centurion Bank and Patenaude and Felix CPA
Petitioner:
Denise Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. USA
as 3:2017cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael A. Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caballero-Perez v. USA
as 2:2016cv02871
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Caballero-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Waugh v. Perez et al
as 3:2016cv00677
Defendant:
Quentin Byrne, James Dzurenda and Perez
Plaintiff:
Travis Waugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Ruiz v. Sandie et al
as 3:2016cv00496
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and William Sandie
Petitioner:
Jose Perez-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Nevens et al
as 2:2016cv01908
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevens
Petitioner:
Ricardo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
