Cases 31 - 40 of 43
MCCRAY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY McCRAY
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JOHN CLARK, LUIS A. VELEZ, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARKS v. DOES et al
as 1:2009cv00943
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARKS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv00911
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and NEIL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BROMFIELD v. MYERS et al
as 1:2008cv01639
Plaintiff:
DAMION BROMFIELD
Defendant:
JULIE MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GUARDIOLA-HERNANDEZ v. MYERS et al
as 1:2008cv01595
Plaintiff:
ALBINO GUARDIOLA-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JULIE MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRUPEI v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TRUPEI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, NORMAN MINETA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCGEE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv01923
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. MCGEE
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, KAREN TANDY, JOHN F. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
