Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Loftis v. Wengler et al
as 1:2012cv00379
Petitioner:
Kirk Andrew Loftis
Respondent:
Tim Wengler and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Elmore County Detention Center Medical Staff et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Russel Scott Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Elmore County Detention Center Medical Staff and Rick Layer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00404
Petitioner:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Respondent:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blanc v. Idaho State Bar et al
as 4:2011cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Blanc
Defendant:
Idaho State Bar, Julia Crossland, Office of Bar Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly et al v. Wengler et al
as 1:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kelly , Jose Pina , Andrew Ibarra and others
Defendant:
Timothy Wengler and Corrections Corporation of America, Inc
Interpleader:
Associated Press, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Adams et al
as 1:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Joanne Adams and Chester Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Valdez, et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, Jimmy T. Glass, Patrick K. Knight and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. USA
as 1:2009cv00260
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
