Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Kesling v. Ada County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Kesling
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesling v. Ada County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harke v. Ada County Sheriffs et al
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Harke
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriffs, Ada County Jail, Ada County Deputy Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Meier v. Dylan Hobson, et al
as 10-35733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MEIER
Defendant - Appellee:
DYLAN HOBSON, JOHN TUDBURY, JOSHUA TOULOUSE and others
Betancourt v. Barroso et al
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Diana Barroso, Yurianna Barroso, Alfonso Barroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meier v. Hobson et al
as 1:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Meier
Defendant:
Dylan Hobson, John Tudbury, Joshua Toulouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harke v. Ada County Sheriffs et al
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael Harke
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriffs and Ada County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Ada County et al
as 4:2007cv00308
Plaintiff:
Christina Sparks
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Sheriff's Department and John Does 1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betancourt v. Ada County Sheriff's Department and Office
as 1:2007cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Department and Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betancourt v. Woodcook
as 1:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Dale Woodcook, Ada County and Ada County Sheriff's Department and Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
