Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Michael Moe v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-17204
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN MOE
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden, Substituted for Brian E. Williams, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Morrow v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv00580
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Morrow
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delapinia v. Williams Sr et al
as 2:2017cv02376
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E Williams Sr
Petitioner:
Ryan L Delapinia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2017cv02156
Defendant:
L. Adams, Romeo Aranas, A. Buen and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irold v. Porto et al
as 2:2017cv01882
Defendant:
Renee Baker, D. Deal, James E. Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Irold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01256
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, James Dzurenda and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Hugo Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafferty v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01093
Defendant:
John Borrowman, James Dzurenda and Brian E Williams Sr
Plaintiff:
Justin Lafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafferty v. Wharton et al
as 2:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
Justin Lafferty
Defendant:
Alexis Lazano, William Wharton and Brian E Williams Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Braunstein v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 17-15461
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Michael McLaughlin v. James Cox, et al
as 16-16869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., NEWTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
