Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Coffelt et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coffelt, Wayne D Merkley and Matthew S Daniels
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Director of Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Humberto Mejia
Defendant:
Canyon County, Municipality, P Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Director of Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Richard D Smith
Defendant:
Director of Idaho Department of Corrections, Director of Idaho Board of Corrections, Director of Idaho Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Blades
as 1:2017cv00527
Petitioner:
Tarango D Padilla
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chatterton v. 104.1 Radio Station et al
as 4:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Chatterton
Defendant:
104.1 Radio Station, Idaho Falls Post Register, Curtis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Blades et al
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
William D Butler
Defendant:
Randy Blades, D.W. McKay, James Fraiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Field et al
as 1:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Debbie Field, David McCluskey, Cindy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barber
Defendant:
Cox, Nicodemus, D.W. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beavers v. Jones
as 2:2017cv00244
Petitioner:
Mark D Beavers
Respondent:
Sandy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
