Cases 31 - 40 of 168
James Alexander v. CDC, et al
as 09-17538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, T. FELKER and others
Richard Crane v. S. Hatton, et al
as 09-17391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HATTON, CO in individual and official capacities, G. SCHOPF, CO, Salinas Valley State Prison, Facility A, COOK J. MAGALLON and others
Jerry Pitts v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-56685
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY FANCIS PITTS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of Corrections
Robert Miranda v. Thomas Carey, et al
as 09-17262
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS MIRANDA
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. CAREY, JEANNE S. WOODFORD, BOOKER WELCH and others
Daniel Valencia v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-56611
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL GABRIEL VALENCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD
Thomas Moore v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-17156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, AKA Jumah Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDC, DEAN BARCHACKY, Correctional Plant Manager II, EDWARD J. CADEN, Acting Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Jerry Cobb v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-17132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. COBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, J. L. SOLIS, J. L. BROWN and others
Van Heang v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-17062
Petitioner - Appellant:
VAN HANG HEANG
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD and ROBERT HOREL
Claudell Martin v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-16934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDELL EARL MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of Department of Corrections, N. GRANNIS, Chief Appeal Officer, MCGUINESS, MD and others
Anthony Dawkins v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-56344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, C. BUTLER, Correctional Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
