Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Caplinger v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Neal Wayne Caplinger
Defendant:
CCA, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Corrections Corporation of America, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00434
Plaintiff:
Scotty James Bailey
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, LLC, Todd J Mullinger, David W Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gisel v. Agler et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Dan Morris Gisel
Defendant:
David Agler, Acel K Thacker and Idaho Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brecht v. ICC et al
as 1:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Melvin Brecht
Defendant:
ICC , CCA , Acel K Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Idaho State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Kevin Young
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Institution, Johanna K Smith, Keith Howard Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Robert J McCormack
Defendant:
Christopher E Caldwell, Ronda K Nichols, Whitehead Anderson & Caldwell PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brown v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, William M Loomis, Johanna K Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wamble-Fisher et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
David Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Shell Wamble-Fisher, Richmond, Johanna K Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skelton v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Shawn K Skelton
Defendant:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Paul Panther, Idaho Correctional Center (CCA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
