Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Smith et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Ada County, Cassia County, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services and State of Idaho
Plaintiff:
Larry Alan Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv00340
Defendant:
Grant Roberts and Corizon Health Services
Plaintiff:
Kelley A.E. Babcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisneros v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Arturo Cisneros
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services and Colin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Corizon Health Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ralph James Reyes
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Nakia Cox
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Eliason et al
as 1:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Garrett M McCoy
Defendant:
Eliason and Ada County Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Idaho Board of Correction, Debbie Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
Chase Reed
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Victor V Contreras
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Idaho Department of Correction and Colin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
