Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Utah
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Patrick v. USA
as 2:2007cv00985
Petitioner: Mark Richard Patrick
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Patrick v. USA
as 2:2007cv00896
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mark Richard Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007mc00714
Petitioner: Jan F. Becker
Defendant: FNU Hudson, George W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pyper v. USA
as 2:2007cv00698
Petitioner: Mark John Pyper
Respondent: USA and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Patrick v. USA
as 2:2007cv00692
Petitioner: Mark Richard Patrick
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Patrick v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00668
Petitioner: Mark Richard Patrick
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patrick v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00545
Petitioner: Mark Richard Patrick
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sherratt v. Shurtleff et al
as 2:2007cv00393
Plaintiff: William Sherratt
Defendant: Mark Shurtleff, Utah Attorney General, Utah Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Weber Morgan Strike Force et al
as 1:2007cv00070
Plaintiff: Curtis Scott Williams
Defendant: Weber Morgan Strike Force, Ryan Reid, Karen McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trafny v. Shurtleff
as 2:2007cv00220
Petitioner: Jerome Victor Trafny
Respondent: Mark L. Shurtleff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?