Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2007cv00239
Petitioner:
Chang Jie Lin
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Li v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv06188
Petitioner:
Xiao Li
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Badi v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00211
Petitioner:
Anouar Badi
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Santiago v. Holt et al
as 1:2007cv02510
Petitioner:
Sammy Santiago
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv01249
Petitioner:
Cui Yin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, John Carbone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
