Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Eubank v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Eubank
Respondent:
Johanna Smith and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doyle v. IDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00137
Petitioner:
Randall Charles Doyle
Respondent:
IDOC, SICI, North Dorm Dayshift Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiore v. Kootenai County Sheriff et al
as 1:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert J Fiore, II
Defendant:
Kootenai County Sheriff, Rocky Watson, Edward Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutler v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mark William Cutler
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Rona Siegert, Larry Hynse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brecht v. Lodge
as 1:2009cv00676
Petitioner:
Melvin Brecht
Respondent:
Edward J Lodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clugey v. USA
as 1:2009cv00412
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Clugey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smrz v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Smrz
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. USA et al
as 1:2007cv00404
Petitioner:
Brian Kelly Whipple
Respondent:
USA and Edward J Lodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smrz v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2007cv00377
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Smrz
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Elmore County Prosecutors Office, Elmore County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr et al v. Tibbs et al
as 1:2006cv00053
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Smrz and Roy Burstein
Defendant:
Tom BeauClair, Pam Sonnen, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
