Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06709
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trahan v. Schneiderman et al
as 2:2015cv06839
Defendant:
Commisioner Anthony Annucci, Governor Andrew Cuomo and Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman
Plaintiff:
Vilimaa Trahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08551
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez v. ADA Perez et al
as 1:2015cv07415
Plaintiff:
Ramon Gutierrez
Defendant:
ADA Perez, Anthony J. Annucci, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2015cv04989
Respondent:
Robert E. Ercole and Eric T. Schneiderman
Petitioner:
Harpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benloss v. Capra et al
as 1:2015cv04925
Petitioner:
Gary Benloss
Respondent:
Superintendent Michael Capra and Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Schneiderman et al
as 7:2015cv06330
Respondent:
Eric T. Schneiderman and Robert E. Ercole
Petitioner:
Harpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2015cv06317
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Watson
Respondent:
Eric T. Schneiderman and Cyrus R. Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhodes v. Racette et al
as 1:2015cv04263
Respondent:
Superintendent Steven Racette and Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman
Petitioner:
Jack Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Chappious et al
as 1:2015cv03838
Petitioner:
Shaman Irvin
Respondent:
P. Chappious and Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
